Should your next hire be
human or AI?
Paste a job description. In 15 seconds you'll get an Agent Fit Score and a side-by-side of what hiring a human vs. an agent for that role actually looks like.
Three quick things the JD doesn't say.
Thirty seconds. These calibrate the score — they're not stored.
How much volume does this role handle per week?
How costly is a wrong decision in this role?
Is the work customer-facing, and is the domain regulated?
Reading the role like a hiring panel.
Seven dimensions, scored and weighted.
This role is built for an agent.
High-volume, rule-based, customer-facing work with low stakes per decision — the pattern an agent fills cleanly. A human in this seat would spend most of their day on tasks that don't need a human.
Human Hire
- Messy escalations & angry customers
- Judgment calls outside the playbook
- Cost & churn at volume
- Nights, weekends, language coverage
Ada
- Instant, consistent first-response
- Tagging, routing, CRM updates
- Genuinely novel, high-stakes calls
- Owning a relationship over months
Show your work
Seven dimensions, each 1–10, weighted into the score. Bars lean green toward human, purple toward agent.
Ready to put Ada on the team?
Book a 15-minute intro with Lua — they'll scope and deploy the agent for this role.
Brief Tech Safari on this role.
This becomes the recruiter brief. A specialist replies within one business day.
Connect with Lua.
Book a 15-minute intro — Lua scopes the agent for this role and gives you a build estimate.